Matwe Middelkoop vs Go Soeda Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W L L W
Form
W W W L L L L L L LH2H: Middelkoop 1 - 0 Soeda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Middelkoop winning 2 and Soeda winning 0. The last match between Middelkoop and Soeda was at the Irving Challenger, 13-03-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Matwe Middelkoop getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matwe Middelkoop | 1 |
| Go Soeda | 0 |
Irving Challenger(13-03-2017)
6
2
6
1
| Middelkoop | Stats | Soeda |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 668 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 197 | Highest Rank | 47 |
| 41 | Age | 40 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 24 |
| 58% (418-303) | Career Total W/L | 58% (658-471) |
| $46,533 | Career Prize Money | $791,590 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Middelkoop VS Soeda H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Middelkoop VS Soeda H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matwe Middelkoop Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
15
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(9) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dustin Brown
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Tommy Paul
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexandre Sidorenko
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Romain Barbosa
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrey Golubev
Player
Matwe Middelkoop
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Go Soeda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Go Soeda
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Go Soeda
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Go Soeda
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Go Soeda
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Go Soeda
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Go Soeda
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Go Soeda
76%
(
90 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
80 of
117)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Ulises Blanch
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
6
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
50 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Viktor Durasovic
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
35 of
42)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (418/303) | Win/Loss | 58% (658/471) |
| 56% (927/720) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1480/1160) |
| 52% (7986/7271) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (13062/12012) |
| 56% (77/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (476/305) |
| 61% (256/161) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (19/31) |
| 53% (83/74) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (124/91) |
| 22% (2/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (39/44) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 568 | Aces Total | 2297 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 440 | Total Double Faults | 1611 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 557.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 582.21 |
| 62% (7659/12353) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28638/49018) |
| 66% (5090/7659) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (19858/28638) |
| 50% (2328/4687) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (10569/20380) |
| 42% (466/1103) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1969/4792) |
| 37% (4481/11962) | Return Points Win % | 39% (19445/49843) |
| 42% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 42% (44/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 23% (6/20) |
| 67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 68% (26/12) |
| 32% (18/39) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (67/85) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (151/142) | Challenger W/L | 63% (443/261) |
| 68% (239/110) | Futures W/L | 69% (72/32) |
| 58% (412/707) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (625/1059) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (22/54) |
| 48% (89/186) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (202/357) |
| 56% (116/206) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (178/323) |
| 88% (408/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (645/564) |
| 11% (408/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (645/81) |
| 18% (313/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (483/92) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
